Leadership, Reckless Speech and the LGBTQ Debate in Kebbi
During a recent official function, the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Religious Affairs in Kebbi State, Dr. Nasiru Abubakar Kigo, made a controversial statement, alleging that Kebbi and Sokoto states have the highest number of “registered gays and lesbians” in the country.
The comment—offered without any verifiable data or context—immediately sparked public outrage, culminating in his suspension.
Though he has since issued a public apology—describing his statement as a “grave mistake” and appearing before an Ulama panel—the ripple effect continues to stir important conversations about the responsibility of public officials, the weight of their words, and the complexities surrounding discussions on homosexuality in conservative societies.
While Dr. Kigo’s statement was seen by many as inflammatory and baseless, it also brought to light a crucial aspect of governance that is too often overlooked: communication.
In regions where social and religious values are deeply intertwined, statements on sensitive topics carry enormous consequences—especially when made by individuals in positions of power.
There is a conspicuous lack of reliable data or academic research on homosexuality in Northern Nigeria—unsurprising in a region where same-sex relationships are not only criminalized under national and Sharia law, but also considered deeply taboo.
This legal and cultural context forces many LGBTQ+ individuals into silence, making it nearly impossible to track or verify claims of a “rise” in homosexuality.
Read Also:
What may be perceived as an increase is more likely a result of growing visibility through digital platforms, increased urban exposure, or global conversations on identity—not necessarily a shift in social values or orientation.
So when a senior government official refers to “registered gays and lesbians,” one is left to ask: registered by whom? Tracked how? And for what purpose? In the absence of clear evidence, such statements do more harm than good.
They have the potential to incite moral panic, justify discrimination, and further endanger already marginalized communities. That said, the issue at hand is not just about the topic of homosexuality, but the broader implications of reckless rhetoric.
In volatile social climates where misunderstanding can lead to violence, public servants must be acutely aware of the influence they wield. A single misguided comment can reinforce harmful stereotypes, divert attention from pressing governance issues, and spark long-lasting societal tension.
The apology offered by the Perm Sec, though necessary, is a reminder that damage control often comes after the harm has already been done. This incident should serve as a wake-up call—not just for him, but for leaders across all levels of government.
There is a pressing need for public figures to speak with responsibility, lean on facts, and approach complex social issues with empathy.
Nigeria is a country straddling the lines between tradition and modernity, faith and freedom, silence and expression. Navigating these contrasts requires leadership that is informed, intentional, and aware of the fragility of the social fabric it governs.
In such a climate, words matter—perhaps more than ever.
Fatimah Yusuf Usman writes from PRNigeria Centre, Abuja. She can be reached via: [email protected]
