Justice Minister Supports Imo Against Rivers over 17 Oil Wells ownership
… Gov Wike storms Apex court over legal battle
Rivers state governor, Barrister Nyesom Ezenwo Wike on Monday stormed the Supreme Court in Abuja to witness the legal battle by his state against Imo state on the ownership of 17 rich oil wells in the territories of the two states.
Wike stayed put in the court room for over two hours the preliminary hearing in the suit lasted by a 7-man panel of Justices of the court led by Justice Kudirat Motomori Kekere Ekun.
The governor declined bluntly to speak with judiciary correspondent at the end of the proceedings.
However, the apex court set fresh January 17, 2022 for definite hearing in the legal battle.
The apex court fixed the new date after the Attorney General of the Federation AGF as 1st defendant and Imo state as 2nd defendant formally regularized the processes filed to counter the claims of Rivers state on the disputed oil wells.
Although the matter was slated for hearing on November 1, counsel to the AGF Dr Remi Peter Olatubora SAN and Chief Olusola Oke SAN for Imo state opted to regularize their new processes after which preliminary hearing was completed.
At the end of the preliminary stage, Justice Kudirat Motomori Kekere Ekun announced January 17,2022 as new date to hear the suit.
The apex court had on July 14 granted an order of injunction stoping the federal government and it’s agencies from ceeding the 17 disputed oil wells located at Akri and Mbede to Imo state.
The order of injunction was granted to stop an alleged implementation of the ceeding of the 17 oil wells to Imo state pending the determination of the suit brought before it by the Rivers state government.
In a chamber ruling by the Supreme Court in an ex-parte application argued by Emmanuel Ukala SAN, the apex court had restrained AGF and the Attorney General of Imo state from taking any further action on the ownership of the disputed 17 oil wells till the ownership disputes surrounding them are resolved.
The apex court also barred the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and the Fiscal Commission, RMAFC, and the office of the Accountant General of the Federation from approving, implementing, or giving effect in any manner to a letter from RMAFC office, with reference number RMC/O&G/47/1/264 of July 1, 2021, which canceled the equal sharing of proceeds from the 17 oil wells by Rivers and Imo states.
Read Also:
Rivers state through its Attorney General had dragged the AGF and the Attorney General of Imo state before the Supreme Court praying for declaration that the boundary between Rivers state and Imo state, as delineated on Nigeria administrative map , 10, 11 and 12 editions and other maps bearing similar delineations are inaccurate, incorrect and do not represent the legitimate and lawful boundaries between Rivers and Imo State.
Plaintiff also sought a declaration that as far as Nigeria’s administrative map 10,11 and 12 editions and other maps bearing similar delineations, relate to the boundaries between Rivers and Imo, the said maps are unlawful and void, cannot be relied on to determine the extent of the territorial governmental jurisdiction of Rivers state and to determine the the revenue accuring to Rivers state from the federation account, including the application of the principle of derivation and other revenue allocation principles as contained in the 1999 Constitution.
It further applied that the Supreme Court declare that the correct instrument maps and documents, to be relied on determining the boundary between Rivers and Imo state, are those used by the plaintiff in delineating the boundary line between Rivers and Imo state.
Plaintiff also sought declaration that all the oil wells within Akri and Mbede communities are wrongly attributed to Imo state and that they are all oil wells within the territory of Rivers state and form part of Rivers state and that it is only rivers that is entitled to receive the full allocation of the distributable revenue from the oil wells on the basis of the 1390 derivation as contained under section 162 of the 1999 constitution.
Rivers therefore sought order of mandatory injunction directing the AGF to calculate, to its satisfaction, and refund to it all revenue that have been wrongly attributed to or paid to Imo state on account of the limit or extent of their territories, including earnings due to it from revenue derived from Akri and Mbede oil wells.
The plaintiff also sought order of Injunction directing the AGF to withdraw from circulation its administrative map 10,11 and 12th editions and to refrain from relying on any of the said maps for the purpose of determining the boundary between Rivers and Imo state.
Rivers also applied for another order of mandatory injunction directing AGF to produce administrative map bearing the correct boundary between Rivers and Imo state.
A sum of N500,000,000 naira was also sought as cost of prosecuting the case.
By PRNigeria
